UFO MEDIA MATTERS

When the DVD, “Secret NASA Transmissions - Smoking Gun” was released, a man, Martin Stubbs, was interviewed. He had downloaded and kept every NASA video from the earlier Shuttle flights. Later, as Mr. Stubbs reviewed the tapes for his own information, he discovered anomalies in some of the video clips. Stubbs was not a “UFO nut” but was a “NASA nut” who was shocked at what he saw. These NASA clips, due to their authenticity, forced the debunkers to come up with clever parlor tricks as explanations for this phenomenon. Since then others who seek the truth take the time to record the NASA station. At every Shuttle launch someone is taping and spending large amounts of time and effort to look over these video images. Thank you all.

This is the STS 116 Mission Discovery launched December 9^th, 2006 returned December 22, 2006.

UFO Media Matters does not have in our possession the original video downloads from the NASA launches. If anyone has these downloads please get in touch with me and I promise to have a scientist, not affiliated with any UFO group, look them over. The images we are offering on this post are excerpts from The DVD entitled:

“Jaime Maussan & Santiago Yturria Garza’s DVD, “NASA Missions & UFO Incidents”

I will present three video clips from the STS 116 Discovery 12 day mission. After you view them I hope we can come to the consensus of what they are not:

1. Ice Crystals	5.The Moon/Sun
2. Meteors	6. Camera Lens Flare
3. Space Junk	7. Stars
4. Sun	8. Lightning

Looking back at the Space Arm. I applied the Zoom for better viewing on the web.

This second clip is from the same shuttle mission looking down on he earth, zoom was applied.

My wife and I disagree over what happens here she believes the object splits. I think it is the lights going on. Zoom for viewing.

The International UFO Congress, producers of the DVD encourage the sharing of these images. However, if you make a copy of the DVD, they request you to donate $5.00 to the International UFO Congress. To me that seems fair, and the debunkers claim it is all about money?

There is controversy within the UFO community concerning Jaimie Maussan's support of “Dr." Jonathan Reed. Jonathan Reed was basically a person who claimed he had shot and kept a dead alien. Most of what he said was discredited and his claims caused debate and anger among UFO researchers. As much as I like what Mr. Maussan has done I think he mistaken when he supported Mr. Reed. But considering what Mr. Maussan went through in his country and in the US with smear campaigns and character attacks I can understand why he might have wanted to help another person who also was not believed. The simple truth is when you get into the UFO evidence you come to believe much more is going on out there. Every person I have ever met has become too trusting at times. It shouldn't reflect on a person's work. When Mr. Maussan challenged his viewers on his TV show to take pictures of “these things” flying around and send the videos to him at the TV station , he received 25,000 tapes of UFOs. If that isn’t the people seeking answers, what is it? Wouldn’t it be a slap at America's prestige if the aliens’ first public contact was in Mexico.

Review of some of the new NASA DVDs I purchased at the International UFO Congress:

The Jaimie Maussan's DVD has NASA footage recording other incidents. Additionally, the video contains clips taken in Mexico and some taken in Italy. The Italian portion involves a witness to multiple and recurring UFO incidents filmed by that witness. Of course you never know in those instances. It usually takes many years to sort out the truth. One of the reports from Mexico is pretty thought provoking. The UFO was filmed from a police officer's car window video cam. The officer had pulled over a speeding car when the dispatcher called him about an object sighted near his location (the dispatcher had received calls regarding the object). The officer eventually filmed it on his camera as it moved down into the valley. After the object left his field of vision he climbed into his car to drove down to the bottom of the valley only to find no object in sight.

There are two DVD sets that I wish to recommend to laymen and scientist alike who are fed up with others telling them what these NASA objects are. Look for yourself. Are these objects anything like what is being explained by NASA and debunkers?

This is one of the most underrated DVDs around. This DVD is for people who want detail. When you look at some of the objects captured on NASA video here, you come to the conclusion that some part of how we describe our physical reality is dead wrong. We need more than ever for science to look outside of the box. In one clip a object moves out from under cloud cover and accelerates to several hundred thousand miles an hour but instead of flying out into space it follows the curvature of the earth. How is that for control? When David goes back into history on the second disk, he loses me. There are a thousand theories of possible ET interactions with humans. I don’t have a real clue which one is real, if any.

Mr. Challender has gone to great lengths to study what NASA is doing. He shows one instance of a 20 second delay, which NASA claims doesn’t happens from live feed. The video he has captured by downlink from NASA missions is fantastic. What I really liked about this DVD is how he goes into detail on each instance with different filters, speeds and magnifications. A scientist with an open mind will appreciate the length this researcher went to studying this phenomenon. I hope Jeff does more research. He also claims that NASA intentionally introduces static to the video feed during the night. I am not sure about that, it looks like they are just turning on the night infrared lens. But I have to check with others about that. Maybe someone out there could take a look.

The scuttlebutt going around is that this year “the existence of the UFO craft will be proven beyond doubt”. Could it be that ET is slowly conditioning us to their presence?

Mr Capp,

You did the public a service by providing these images inasmuch as one could
suppose the last thing a space agency would promote, especially in light of
it's troubled history, is a focus on anomalies rather than routine, (and the
more routine, the better) assurance that all is well and under "control"
One issue that you may or may not have investigated, is the encryption
channel retrofitted onto mission communications systems and the specific
flight protocols which require it's use. I cannot imagine that there are not
any...

...and one other interesting facet is ( if such a thing exists) would be to
log use of the encrypted communication channel and then have it synchronized
to time stamped "unusual sightings". if such are kept as time stamped data.
Just a thought...that this may be a means of collaborating two sources of
evidentiary data tied to one another. if so this lessens the probability
that these could be passed off as routine rather than unusual....

Another area rife with possibilities but extremely, if not impossible to
break it's bonds to national security, are the VLF transmissions from
tactical submarines which I strongly suspect have had some very, interesting
encounters whilst submerged and have had to communicate these as close
encounters that may put a submersible in a vulnerable position from their
point of view. Perhaps one day someone will come forward....

Another interesting avenue are private surveillance satellites...it's a shame
these cannot be targeted on a rapid response basis....I think it's
reasonable to consider that the same scenario is playing out with defense
system satellites for visual tracking as radar appears to be essentially
worthless. hence oft reported interception flights that " show up out of
nowhere". jets or helicopters...

I think it would be very difficult task. We don't know what specific language NASA would use to indicate a time stamp of any unusually phenomenon. I would bet, if it happens, it would be something we wouldn't think of. I also believe when freedom of information researchers are performing their data mining on UFOs, most of the documents have been already sanitized,

(especially any dealing with a smoking gun incident) for any possible reference words like UFOs. To really find the documents you need the code words'. According to one source, "Intelligence Officers" think "scientist are rather naive."

You have made a interesting point. We know some enigmas have been captured and posted before by satellite on Google. Could you imagine what could be out there in the images you can't get. What I've not been able to grasp is the blasé way people handle these videos. Are they seeing what I'm seeing? If Jamie Maussan's group has fake these videos, let's have at it, if they haven't what are these? I asked one skeptical friend and he said he didn't know. He has surrendered his inquiring mind to the experts. He said "do you think the scientists would keep quiet about this?" Needless to say, my friend has a very limited history on what it means to a career if a scientist were to even entertaining an alien spacecraft theory. They may end up killing yourself. I call this reaction to reality soma land. I was in my own soma land for a while after 9/11. I swore to myself after these last four years I would never surrender my mind to someone else on political matters and on scientists' lack of interest in regard to the possibility of craft existence.. I am 63 and was a part of the sixties movement. I couldn't recognize who I had become. UFO craft are not a matter of faith to me and to many other witnesses. Bottom line: there is much out there to be done, many lessons to be learned; some from debunkers who expect a rather lame investigation to the errors in judgment and the outright manipulations of the facts by past and present UFO researchers.

PS. On a future post I will present in video by NASA of Ice crystals and a UFO object in the same clip. It time to decide for ourselves what we see.